In Reply to: RE: Perhaps it doesn't occur to you and the other guy that posted by Peter H-son on November 24, 2007 at 15:42:40:
>> "terribly cynical to think that Jackson or any of the artisans were focused on the marketing aspects of this film">>
> My bad. Jackson just asked somebody to hand him $100m to shoot an art movie.>
yep your bad. actually it was more along the lines of 180 million for three movies. rather low budget by todays standards. Given the ambitiousness of the project it was a ridiculously low number. I have had many discussions with Richard Taylor the head of the makeup effects about the making of Lord of the Rings. It was indeed very much more like a low budget art house project given the scope of the material. so yes, your bad, you are way off base on this one.
>> "Don't be naive. Filmmaking is absolutely not an art. Everybody is only doing a business."--Chow Yun-fat>>
Utter bullshit. even though Chow Yun Fat is by all reports a nice guy he must have been in quite a mood when he said that. There are times when we all feel this way. If it were just a business no one would be in it. There are easier ways to make a buck.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Perhaps it doesn't occur to you and the other guy that - Analog Scott 16:34:43 11/24/07 (7)
- RE: Perhaps it doesn't occur to you and the other guy that - Peter H-son 16:55:27 11/24/07 (6)
- God yet another idiot - Analog Scott 18:07:47 11/24/07 (5)
- RE: God yet another idiot - Peter H-son 18:50:07 11/24/07 (4)
- i have no problem with people disagreeing with me - Analog Scott 18:57:31 11/24/07 (3)
- RE: i have no problem with people disagreeing with me - Peter H-son 06:59:52 11/25/07 (2)
- RE: i have no problem with people disagreeing with me - Analog Scott 08:23:51 11/25/07 (1)
- RE: i have no problem with people disagreeing with me - Peter H-son 10:06:59 11/25/07 (0)