In Reply to: Blockbusters "suck" because of the general subject matter: no posted by tinear on November 23, 2007 at 15:36:59:
>> matter the director or the length.>>
Laurence of Arabia sucked? The Godfather sucked?
> They have snot-nosed test audiences? Only if that's the target audience, Scott.>
Sadly it is. They are the ones going to the movies these days.
> Not all directors are able to make audience pleasing films as well as "artistic" ones.>
The great ones often succeed.
>> Producers aren't in the business of supporting directors' egos: it's an industry. Like all parents, directors think everything about their child is precious.>>
Yes but that does not make the business model an ideal. You seem to think the producers have no ego in this whole thing. That IMO is the problem. Their egos are getting in the way.
>> "Apocalypse, Now" is a prefect example of a bloated director making a ridiculously long film: the producer could have cut another half an hour with no loss; adding another hour made it fatter than Brando.>>
Apocalypse now is not an example of anything. It as unique as it gets. It was a happy accident. there have been a few.
>> But, anyhow, you're only involved with pulp anyway, right?>>
No. My last three films were Skin, Redblet and Paraiso Travel. Hardly Hollywood blockbuster material.
>> 300 and Sin City, weren't they?>>
300 yes. I had nothing to do with Sin City. 300 is a prime example of bucking the studio system. We were low budget enough that WB largely stayed out of our way. we were lucky enough to stack the test screenings so no cuts were actually made. you might note that there is no director's cut being sold in the case of 300. that is because what was released was the actual directors cut. No changes were made thanks to the amazing scores in the test screanings. the amazing scores were due in no small part to the infaltration of Frank Miller fans who had a particular appreciation for the film's fidelity to the graphic novel. hope that helps clear things up for you.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Blockbusters "suck" because of the general subject matter: no - Analog Scott 09:55:01 11/24/07 (3)
- Directors' cuts of Larry of A or Godfather? They also had - tinear 14:35:38 11/24/07 (1)
- RE: Directors' cuts of Larry of A or Godfather? They also had - Analog Scott 16:37:11 11/24/07 (0)
- The guys sits on the beach, does not work, lives off his wife's dime, and you are only on "pulp?" Idiot.nt - jamesgarvin 10:22:30 11/24/07 (0)